Inicio

Report

 

INDEX

 

1. INTRODUCTION - 6

 

2. GROUP A - 8
 

A.1- INTRODUCTION AND GROUP STRUCTURE - 9

      A.1.1- Project Objectives and Calculated Variables - 9
         A.1.1.1- Subjective and Objective Assessment - 9
            A.1.1.1.1- Vehicle Handling - 11
            A.1.1.1.2- Frequency Response Test - 12
         A.1.1.2- Group Function - 13
            A.1.1.2.1- Models - 14
               A.1.1.2.1.1- Simple Model - 14
               A.1.1.2.1.2- Full Model - 15
               A.1.1.2.1.3-Steering Wheel Torque - 15  
               A.1.1.2.1.4- CARSIMED - 15
            A.1.1.2.2- Modifications - 16
         A.1.1.3- Links with Other Groups -16

A.2- Description of the models - 18

       A.2.1- Quick description - 18
          A.2.1.1-The simple model - 18
             A.2.1.1.1- The roll axis assumption - 18
             A.2.1.1.2- The construction of the model - 19
             A.2.1.1.3- The forces applications assumptions - 21
         A.2.1.2- The full model - 24
             A.2.1.2.1- The construction of the model - 24
      A.2.2- The reasons to keep two models - 26
      A.2.3- Explanations about the linear and non-linear analysis -27

A.3- Description of the improvements - 29

      A.3.1- Identification of the sources of errors - 29
          A.3.1.1- List of the potential sources of errors - 29
      A.3.2- Improvements chosen - 30

          A.3.2.1- Body stiffness - 30

          A.3.2.2- Mechanical trail, pneumatic trail and caster angle - 31

          A.3.2.3- Variation of the speed during the test - 33

          A.3.2.4- Tyre relaxation - 34

          A.3.2.4- Scrub derivative - 37

 A.4-STEERING INPUT - 42

      A.4.1- The linear model - 42
         A.4.2- The non-linear model - 42
         A.4.3- Defining the shape of the Steering input signal - 43
         A.4.4- Using Experimental Steering input signal -48

A.5- Comparison between the Full Model and the Simple Model - 50

     A.5.1- Lateral Acceleration – Gain - 53
     A.5.2- Lateral acceleration – Phase - 54
     A.5.3- Roll rate – Gain - 54
     A.5.4- Yaw rate Gain & Phase - 54
     A.5.5- Conclusion - 55

A.6- Sensitivity Trials for the Full Model - 56

     A.6.1- Nominal Values - 57
     A.6.2- Changed values - 57
     A.6.3- Conclusion - 80

A.7- Overall conclusion for Group A - 81

     A.7.1- Future work - 81
        A.7.1.1- Some parameters have not been considered in the model - 82

        A.7.1.2- Detailed study of frequency response curves - 82

 

3. GROUP B - 83

 

B.1-MEASUREMENT OF THE WHEEL INERTIA ABOUT ITS SPIN AXIS - 84

      B.1.1-Description of the experimen - 84
      B.1.2-Data, Formula and Results - 84

B.2-REPARTITION OF THE WEIGHT ON THE WHEEL AXIS - 86

      B.2.1-Settings - 86
      B.2.2-Electronic scales - 86
      B.2.3-Measurements - 87
      B.2.4-Exploitation of the results: determination of the center of mass. - 88

B.3-Rolling Radius - 90

      B.3.1-Introduction - 90
      B.3.2-Method - 90
      B.3.3-Results - 92
          B.3.3.4-Discussion -92

B.4-CAMBER AND CASTOR ANGLES, PNEUMATIC TRAIL AND
KING PIN INCLINATION
- 94

      B.4.1-Camber angle - 94

      B.4.2-Castor angle - 95

      B.4.3-Pneumatic trail - 97

      B.4.4-King pin inclination - 97

       B.4.5-Discussion - 97

B.5-MECHANICAL TRAIL - 98

B.6-SUSPENSION DERIVATIVES - 100

      B.6.1-Set up - 100

      B.6.2-Results - 101

      B.6.3-Conclusion - 103

B.7-SUSPENSION DERIVATIVES (II) - 104

B.8-Steering gear ratio - 107

      B.8.1-Introduction - 107

      B.8.2-Method - 107

B.9-CORNERING STIFFNESS - 110

B.10-FRONT ROLL STIFFNESS -113

      B.10.1-Introduction - 113

      B.10.2-Method - 113

      B.10.3-Discussion - 114

B.11-SUSPENSION DAMPING FACTOR - 116

      B.11.1-Requirement to perform the test - 116

      B.11.2-Front axle damping - 116

      B.11.3-Rear axle Damping - 125

 

4. GROUP C 128

 

C.1-INTRODUCTION - 129

C.2-YAW AND ROLL RATE GYROSCOPES - 131

      C.2.1-Background about gyroscopes - 131
      C.2.2- Procedure for calibrating the gyros - 132

         C.2.2.1- Construction of the pendulum - 133
         C.2.2.2- Fitting the gyros on the pendulum - 133
         C.2.2.3- Mathematical approach for calibrating the gyroscopes - 137

C.3-LATERAL AND LONGITUDINAL ACCELERATIONS - 143

     C.3.1-Expectation and choice of the accelerometer - 143
        C.3.1.1- Our main accelerometer performances are - 143

     C.3.2- Calibration of the linear accelerometer - 144

         C.3.2.1-Power supply and acquisition chain - 149

     C.3.3- Mounting of the accelerometer -149

C.4-STEERING ANGLE MEASUREMENT - 150

     C.4.1-Requirements -150

     C.4.2-Potentiometer choice and specifications - 152

     C.4.3-Potentiometer mounting - 153
     C.4.4-Potentiometer calibration - 154

C.5-POWER SUPPLY - 156

     C.5.1-First approach - 156
        C.5.1.1- High voltage supply -156
        C.5.1.2- Low voltage supply - 156

     C.5.2-second approach - 160

C.6- THE DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM - 162

     C.6.1- Introduction - 162
     C.6.2- Steps of data acquisition -163

        C.6.2.1- DBK18 – Signal Conditioning - 164

        C.6.2.2 DaqBook -166
        C.6.2.3 DaqView – Software - 167
        C.6.3- Aliasing - 170

 

5. GROUP D - 171
 

D.1- Summary - 172

D.2-Introduction - 173

   D.2.1-What is signal processing and why do we need it for this application?      - 173

   D.2.2-Role of signal processing group within the assignment - 175

D.3- Background to frequency analysis - 178

D.4- Matlab programs - 181

D.5- Results from the airfield test - 186

D.6- Carsim educational - 194

     D.6.1-CarSimEd  - 194

        D.6.1.1- Construction of the vehicle model in Carsimed - 195

        D.6.1.2- Simulation of the tests using Carsimed - 198

D.7-Achievements of the Group - 206

D.8-Dynamics 2001 Graphic User Interface - 207

     D.8.1-Introduction - 207

     D.8.1-GUI Description - 208

 

6. PROJECT MANAGEMENT - 215

 

6.1 Creation of the Management Team - 215

6.2 Groups and Tasks -216

6.3 Evolution of the Project - 218

6.4 Communication - 226

6.5 conclusions - 226

 

7. Airfield test - 227

7.1 Considerations  - 228

     7.1.1 Conditions of the test -  230

7.2 The pre-test - 230

7.3 The Test - 231

 

8. Final comparisons - 234

8.1 Summary of the features of all cases -  241
8.2 Comparisons between models and airfield test - 242
8.3 Comparison between laden and unladen cases - 243

 

9. Conclusions - 244

 

Appendix - 245

A 1.- Group A. hierarcical structure of the simple model

A 2.- group a. hierarcical structure of the full model

A 3.- group a. AUTOSIM code

A 4.- group b. addendum

A 5.- group c. instruments specifications

A 6.- group d. Matlab files

A7.- management team. minutes meetings